Previous Page:
2.2 Human Footprint and Vegetation Trend: 1950 to 2021
Next Page:
2.4 Spotlight: Effects of 2023 Wildfires

Scroll for more

Getting Started

Navigating this Report

 

This report consists of two companion reports—one for the Northern Operating Area and one for the Southern Operating Area. All the features necessary to navigate within each report as well as switch between reports are included in the bookmark on the left of the screen. These features include:


Main Menu

The main menu is accessed through the hamburger menu in the "bookmark" on the left-hand side of the page. This report is divided into five chapters. From this menu, you can access each of the main chapters and their sections from anywhere in the report.

Tip: The down arrowhead expands when you are viewing a chapter within the hamburger menu. You can quickly navigate to any section within a chapter by making a selection from the expanded menu.

North and South Reports

Click these icons to navigate between the reports for the Northern Operating Area and Southern Operating Area. 

 

Information Guide

Click on the "information" icon in the left menu to access the report navigation guide. You can access this at any time without leaving the page you’re on.

The "page turner" arrows at the bottom left of your screen will sequentially take you through the report, page by page. For example, press the right arrow to move from Section 2.1 to Section 2.2.

Tip: If you’re interested in the full report, we encourage you to start with the Introduction found in Chapter 1, and use the page turner function (arrows on the bottom left of the page) to sequentially navigate through the report.

Introduction

Land base attribution uses the ABMI’s wall-to-wall vegetation and human footprint mapping for 2010 and 2021 to summarize changes in native vegetation.

This analysis adds to the preceding summaries of native vegetation trend (Section 2.2) in three ways: 

  • Along with human footprint, this analysis also shows the changes in native vegetation due to fire, the dominant natural disturbance in both boreal and foothill ecosystems. In these forests, fires—along with other natural disturbances like insect outbreaks and disease—create a mosaic of stands of different ages from young forests to forests more than 150 years old. This mosaic of ages helps maintain biodiversity across northwestern Alberta. 
  • Land base attribution analyzes changes in each native vegetation type and assigns them to specific types of human footprint, summarized here as forestry versus non-forestry footprints.  
  • Land base attribution includes the effects of aging in undisturbed native stands or forestry areas. For vegetation types with an age criterion, like old stands, this allows for the tracking of both recruitment and losses from fire and human footprint. This provides a clearer understanding of why old forests are changing and whether these changes will continue.

In this section, we summarize how vegetation types in Tolko’s Southern Operating Area were affected by fire, along with forestry footprint and other human footprint, from 2010 to 2021.

 
Richard Caners

Wildfire is the dominant type of natural disturbance impacting native vegetation in northwestern Alberta.

Jason Kasumovic

Land uses affect native habitats in different ways. Some cause temporary changes that allow for regrowth (e.g., forest harvesting), while others (e.g., roads, industrial sites) lead to permanent habitat loss.

Katherine Maxcy

Aging forest stands, whether after fire or forest harvesting, can lead to an increase in old forest area.

Results

Land Base Changes in Vegetation Types

The per cent area of native vegetation disturbed by human footprint and fire between 2010 and 2021 in the Southern Operating Area was:

12.1%
area disturbed


Detailed Change in All Native Vegetation: 2010 to 2021

  • As shown in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, a high annual percentage of area was disturbed by human footprint in White Spruce and mixedwood stands in the Southern Operating Area, with more moderate rates of disturbance in deciduous and pine stands. 
  • Fire added 4-6% of disturbance in upland stands over the same 11-year time span, including: mixedwood (6%), White Spruce (5%), deciduous (4%), and pine (4%). 
  • When considering the combined disturbed area of both human footprint and wildfire, area impacted ranged from 10% in pine forest to approximately 20% area disturbed in both White Spruce (20%) and mixedwood (22%) stands between 2010 and 2021. The 20% disturbance over 11 years in White Spruce represents a 55-year disturbance return interval.  
  • Stands disturbed by fire and forestry provide early seral habitat valued by some species, and those stands will recover towards older-forest conditions over time (results shown in Section 3.3). However, the high disturbance rates when fire is added to forestry will generate a truncated age distribution, making it hard to maintain old forest in the long term.
Detailed Land Base Change

Detailed Land Base Change. For the Southern Operating Area, the top figure shows the total area (km2) of each vegetation type disturbed by fire, non-forestry human footprint (Other Footprint, New), and forestry footprint between 2010 and 2021, as well as the undisturbed area as of 2021. The bottom figure shows the per cent (%) area disturbed by fire, non-forestry human footprint, and forestry human footprint in each vegetation type between 2010 and 2021.

Detailed Change in Old Forest: 2010 to 2021

  • A benefit of the land base attribution summaries is that they partition out what is causing changes in old forest. This includes losses from forestry, other human footprint, and fires, along with recruitment as undisturbed stands age across the 120-year cutoff.  
  • Forestry removed 13–25% of old forest in the four upland stand types between 2010 and 2021, with the highest rates in mixedwood (-25%), while fire removed an additional 7–9%. 
  • Over the same time, a large area of deciduous forest matured into the >120-year age class, leading to a large percentage (+55%) gain of old deciduous stands in the region.
  • Recruitment of old forest was similarly high in mixedwood (+33.0%) stands, but this was almost exactly matched by the losses to forestry (-25.0%) and fire (-8.0%) over that time span, leading to little net change.
  • There was a net loss of old conifer stands due to low recruitment of White Spruce and pine into older age classes.
Detailed Land Base Change—Old (>120 years) Forest

Detailed Land Base Change—Old (>120 years) Forest. For the Southern Operating Area, the top figure shows the total area (km2) of old forest by type in 2010 broken into undisturbed area as of 2021, area disturbed by fire, non-forestry human footprint (Other Footprint, New), and forestry footprint between 2010 and 2021, and area recruited into the >120-year-old forest age class between 2010 and 2021. The bottom figure shows the per cent (%) area disturbed by fire, non-forestry footprint, and forestry footprint, and area recruited into the >120-year-old forest age class between 2010 and 2021 in each forest type.

We are grateful for the support of the ABMI's delivery partners.